Buyer resource
STEP vs IGES for CNC Manufacturing
Both formats can exchange geometry, but STEP is generally the more reliable starting point for modern solid-model CNC reviews.
Why STEP is usually preferred
STEP commonly preserves solid bodies and assembly structure more consistently. It is easier to interrogate for volume, faces and manufacturable features than a collection of disconnected surfaces.
Where IGES can still be useful
IGES may be needed for older systems or surface-focused data. Imported surfaces should be checked for gaps, reversed faces and missing trims before quoting or programming.
The 2D drawing remains essential
A model rarely defines every tolerance, datum, thread, surface finish, coating, inspection instruction or revision note. Pair the 3D file with a controlled PDF drawing.
Before sending files
- Confirm units and revision
- Remove unrelated proprietary geometry
- Check that the exported body opens as expected
- Name the controlling model and drawing clearly
- Use the secure RFQ upload instead of a public media link
Review your actual part
Send the model, drawing and requirements for a manufacturing assessment.
